Cases 71 - 80 of 3,113
HAFNER v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2024cv00481
Plaintiff:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY and NEW JERSEY SECRETARY OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cunningham v. Turner et al
as 3:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
DONALD TURNER, Sara Barnett, Genesis Womens Shelter & Support and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hassler v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Gina Hassler
Defendant:
The City of New York, Akila Nanayakkara and Edward Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis et al v. Murphy et al
as 9:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Katarina Renee Kerr Davis and Darrel Wayne Kerr
Defendant:
Sydney Murphy and Norma Sue Gaston Coward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Nunez v. Mishelow et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Antonia M Gonzalez-Nunez
Defendant:
Jason Mishelow, Thomas McAdams, Jessica Marquez Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
De Avila v. Murphy et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Jamie de Avila
Defendant:
Timothy Murphy and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McMickle v. Bishop et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Gary McMickle
Defendant:
Michael Bishop, Danielle L. Gately, Robert J. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Personal Property)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
