Cases 81 - 90 of 182
Nash et al v. Metropolitan Housing Authority et al
as 4:2015cv00507
Plaintiff:
Leon Nash and Carrie Lester
Defendant:
Metropolitan Housing Authority, Rodney Forte, Carl Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00164
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Michael Gregg-Wilson v. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarbor
as 15-1699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GREGG-WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP, SUE ERWIN HARPER, FOLEY & LARDNER and others
LAMOTTE v. HOUSTOULAKIS et al
as 2:2015cv12218
Plaintiff:
KURTIS JAMES LAMOTTE
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER HOUSTOULAKIS, SERGEANT DICKEY, DETECTIVE SGT. SHOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
DICKEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00577
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and KURT ALEXANDER
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DICKEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2015cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gregg-Wilson v. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP et al
as 3:2015cv00807
Plaintiff:
Michael Gregg-Wilson
Defendant:
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Sue Erwin Harper, Foley & Lardner LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Surface et al v. Conklin et al
as 1:2015cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey P. Surface and Laura Pavlech
Defendant:
Scott Conklin, Michael K. Dickey, Todd Adamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
