Cases 1 - 10 of 416
Talley v. Brooks
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Roderick Greer Talley
Defendant:
Debbie Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Talley v. Mumford et al
as 3:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Roderick Greer Talley
Defendant:
Gerald Mumford, Judge Johnnie McDaniels, Judge Kenneth Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Lane Caviness, et al v. Atlas Air, Inc., et al
as 24-11033
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS, PATRICK AKERLUND, MICHAEL ALZATI and others
Defendant:
ATLAS AIR, INC. and FLIGHT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Talley v. Jackson State University et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Roderick Greer Talley
Defendant:
Jackson State University and Eric Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Campbell et al v. Schroeder et al
as 0:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
Venedia Larita Campbell and Martin Alan Smith, II
Defendant:
Andrew William Schroeder, Kyle Allen Williams, Paul Franz Albers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jermaine McAdory v. Alexis Limon, et al
as 24-1703
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE MCADORY
Defendant:
ALEXIS LIMON, RANDALL WILBORN and ALFONSO GREER
Swift v. Walmart Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Charles Swift
Defendant:
Walmart, Walmart Corporation and Shanita Greer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
