Cases 1 - 10 of 487
Choke Canyon Motel, Inc. v. City of Port Aransas et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Choke Canyon Motel, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Port Aransas, David Parsons, Adams . Rick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Carlson v. Pratt et al
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Maggie Mae Carlson
Defendant:
Torilynn Pratt, Josiah Botsworth, Robert Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Emrit v. Pratt et al
as 6:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Kara Pratt, Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Texas Bar, Texas Board of Disciplinary Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cambell v. Hyatt et al
as 4:2023cv01547
Plaintiff:
Lamont Cambell
Defendant:
Jimmy Hyatt, Michael Pratt, John Winter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REED v. PRATT
as 2:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
JAMES KENNETH REED
Defendant:
DONNA PRATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright et al v. Brookside, Town of et al
as 2:2023cv01543
Plaintiff:
Kwame Wright, Kaitlyn Mishae Russell and Lonnie Pratt
Defendant:
Brookside, Town of, Michael Jones, Bradley Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
