Cases 1 - 10 of 1,357
Hunt v. Lawrence
as 1:2024cv04174
Defendant:
Brandon Lawrence
Plaintiff:
Cameron Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kniffin v. Frazier et al
as 3:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Jon Kniffin
Defendant:
Abigail Frazier, Kristen Hunt and Patrick Clohessy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunt v. Tik Tok Inc. Nashville et al
as 3:2024cv01106
Plaintiff:
Miranda A. Hunt
Defendant:
Casey Virtuoso, Phil Sloss and Tik Tok Inc. Nashville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brown et al v. The City of Lynchburg et al
as 6:2024cv00039
Defendant:
The City of Lynchburg, Virginia State Trooper John Roe, LPD Officers John Does 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Lee Brown, Jr. and Da'Quan Hunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05312
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
JH et al v. Dunmore School District et al
as 3:2024cv01154
Defendant:
Frank Sottile, Timothy Hopkins, Dunmore School District and others
Plaintiff:
Bridget Humphreys, JH and David Humphreys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clark v. Clegg et al
as 3:2024cv01740
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Clark
Defendant:
Hunt County Sheriffs Department and Baylen Clegg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rabold v. Hayes et al
as 6:2024cv01580
Defendant:
Amanda Faye Hayes and Janis Hunt
Plaintiff:
Joshua-Wayne Rabold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
