Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Clervrain v. McConchie et al
as 1:2021cv01379
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain also known as Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu doing business as Brandako, Inc, Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu, Manetirony Clervrain and others
Defendant:
Dan McConchie, Jim Durkin, Ronna McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01591
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Winchester v. Illinois Republican Party et al
as 3:2018cv01137
Plaintiff:
Robert Winchester
Defendant:
Illinois Republican Party , Shaun Murphy, Judy Diekelman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Apple, Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv04421
Plaintiff:
TERELL GRAY
Defendant:
Apple Incorporated , APPLE STORE , KELLEY DORGAN and others
Movant:
Target
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Aydelotte et al v. Town of Skykomish et al
as 2:2014cv00307
Plaintiff:
George R Aydelotte
Defendant:
Town of Skykomish , Alan A Grider , Crystal Grider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
GRAY v. APPLE, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2013cv07798
Plaintiff:
TERELL GRAY
Defendant:
APPLE, INCORPORATED, APPLE STORE, KELLEY DORGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perales v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00957
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Vulcan Inc, William Henry Gates, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
