Cases 1 - 10 of 1,881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Howard v. Bisenius, et al
as 24-1502
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. HOWARD
Defendant:
THERESA A. BISENIUS, JENNIFER M.R. ULWICK, MARY RUDOLPH BLACK and others
Bruno Mpoy v. State of Maryland
as 24-1474
Plaintiff:
BRUNO K. MPOY, Individually and as a Next Friend of T.M. and C.M.
Defendant:
STATE OF MARYLAND, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, MARCY WAXMAN and others
Lucien v. Brazil et al
as 1:2024cv11341
Plaintiff:
James Lucien
Defendant:
John Brazil, George Foley, William Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dewayne Harris
Defendant:
Mike Reed, Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC, John Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolliver (PS) v. Bailey et al
as 1:2024cv01404
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Chonteyaih Bailey, Imani Bailey, Gabrelle Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLACK v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv01449
Plaintiff:
DONNA A. BLACK
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, LEWIS D. FEREBEE, GEORGE GREENHOW and others
Tolliver (PS) v. Wire Tranfers 121000248 et al
as 1:2024cv01356
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Wire Tranfers 121000248, Routing Number 121042882, Wells Fargo Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tolliver (PS) v. Emanual et al
as 1:2024cv01359
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Cesear Emanual, Black Ink Crew, Abury Oday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 198
Roberts v. Thompson, et al
as 6:2024cv02024
Plaintiff:
Leticia Roberts
Defendant:
Tony Thompson and Black Hawk County, Iowa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Denial of Due Process
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
