Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Zloza v. Borton et al
as 1:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zloza
Defendant:
Borton, Ideal Crane, Synergy Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Livingston v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv01722
Defendant:
Jennifer Sachse, Charlie Baker, Kelly Casey and others
Plaintiff:
Berry L. Livingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borton v. Fagan, Inc.
as 1:2018cv13040
Plaintiff:
Kenzie Borton
Defendant:
Fagan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deanna Robinson v. Randy Meeks, et al
as 18-10473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEANNA J. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF RANDY MEEKS, in his individual and official capacities, JOSH ROBINSON, Deputy #457 Hunt County, WILLIAM WITTEN, Deputy #444 Hunt County and others
Gillespie v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services et al
as 3:2017cv02826
Plaintiff:
Jessica Rene Gillespie
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Morgan Shields, Holly Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borton v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 4:2017cv02209
Plaintiff:
Michele Borton
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Robinson v. Meeks et al
as 3:2017cv00606
Defendant:
Randy Meeks , Josh Robinson , William Witten and others
Plaintiff:
Deanna J Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
