Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Arrow Legal Solutions Group et al v. Maughan et al
as 2:2023cv00868
Plaintiff:
Arrow Legal Solutions Group, Loren M Lambert, Cecilia Salazar and others
Defendant:
Jaceson R Maughan, Christopher C Hill, Aurora Holley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. WINSTON SALEM FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICE et al
as 1:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RON HILL
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICE, FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICER ROBERT WYRICK and FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICER KEVIN ALLIGOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. HORNBACK
as 4:2021cv00080
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER G. HILL
Defendant:
RONALD A. HORNBACK, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. McKenzie et al
as 1:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lynn Hill
Defendant:
Jim McKenzie, David A Vela, Sam Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Hill et al
as 9:2016cv00140
Plaintiff:
Monita Bryant
Defendant:
Christopher D Hill, Kaylee Harrod, CPS-Gregg County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher T Hill v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation Inc et al
as 2:2013cv02169
Defendant:
Caesars Entertainment Corporation Inc and Caesars Entertainment Operating Corporation, Inc.
Unknown:
Monica M Quinn and Monica M Quinn
Plaintiff:
Christopher T Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Christopher T Hill v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation Inc et al
as 5:2013cv01163
Defendant:
Caesars Entertainment Corporation Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Christopher T Hill
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01864
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicu:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
