Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
Boylan v. Wardlaw et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Timothy T Boylan, Jr
Defendant:
Brandon D Wardlaw, Adam Barnett, Timothy Distasio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ragless v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv10050
Plaintiff:
Kyle Ragless
Defendant:
Christopher Jones and Michael Olsaver
Ragless v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Kyle Ragless
Defendant:
Christopher Jones and Michael Olsaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Resurrection House Ministries, Inc v. City of Brunswick et al
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Resurrection House Ministries, Inc
Defendant:
City of Brunswick, Cosby H. Johnson, Julie T. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
City of San Diego and Alternate Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Jones v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv06999
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Williams et al
as 2:2022cv05097
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Jones, Jr and Christopher Jones
Defendant:
ABC Insurance Agencies, Orleans Parish District Attorney, Jason Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATERMAN v. KEEN et al
as 2:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
CRAIG WATERMAN
Defendant:
CHIEF SHAWN KEEN, SERGEANT JUSTIN SEARS, OFFICER ALAN JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
