Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Lewis et al v. Wang
as 2:2022cv11999
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lewis and Danielle Lewis
Defendant:
Yanling Wang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00431
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01484
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01805
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Lewis v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv00370
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1-10 and P.O. Leon Pedigo
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wayne Hart v. 90th Judicial District Court, et al
as 15-1938
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE THOMAS HART
Defendant - Appellee:
90TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, named as State of Michigan, 90th Judicial District Court for the Couny of Emmet, JAMES N. ERHART, Judge, LARRY L. BURGESS, Magistrate and others
WEIMER v. CIMA et al
as 2:2015cv00920
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEWIS WEIMER
Defendant:
JAMES P. CIMA, ELIZABETH SUE CIMA and CINDY TURLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. 90th Judicial District Court et al
as 1:2015cv00606
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Hart
Defendant:
90th Judicial District Court, James N. Erhart, Larry L. Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
