Cases 1 - 10 of 702
Rafiyq Davis v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-2028
Plaintiff:
RAFIYQ DAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Tepe v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, United States, Rebecca Rutherford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MacDonald et al v. US Department of the Treasury et al
as 3:2024cv01265
Plaintiff:
Duncan John MacDonald and The Duncan MacDonald Family
Defendant:
US Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Daniel Werfel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pennington v. Does et al
as 4:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Pennington, Jr
Defendant:
Does Arianna, H&R Block Agent; John Doe, Agent, Internal Revenue Services; John Doe, Agent and JoAnn Agee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01965
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01970
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01912
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ketchup v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2024cv01915
Plaintiff:
Crystal Ketchup and Crystal Jackson
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Fulton County Sheriff's Department, San Bernardino County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
