Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Scott v. City of Tacoma et al
as 3:2024cv05066
Plaintiff:
Jamika Scott
Defendant:
City of Tacoma, Christopher Bain, Connor D. Cockle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Hottenrott et al v. Iron, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Tammy Moyer, Karen Hottenrott, Tammy Cairns and others
Defendant:
Iron, County of, Melanie Camps, Menominee, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Swenson v. Yee et al
as 1:2023cv10259
Plaintiff:
Carol Swenson
Defendant:
Phillip Yee, Matt Donoghue, Paul Zaniboni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clervrain et al v. Tillis et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Manetiony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
Thom Tillis, Sydney Batch, Madison Cawthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UnifySCC et al v. Cody et al
as 5:2022cv01019
Plaintiff:
UnifySCC, Tom Davis and Maria Ramirez
Defendant:
Sara H. Cody, James Williams, Jeffrey Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv09879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hines v. Smith
as 6:2021cv06314
Defendant:
Jeffrey Smith
Plaintiff:
Supreme Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurley v. Fuchs et al
as 1:2020cv00850
Defendant:
Stephanie A Fuchs, Social Security Administration, Jeffrey Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila Hurley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
