Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Van Schaick v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2024cv20726
Plaintiff:
Joshua-Michael Van Schaick
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Van Schaick v. Miami- Dade Aviation Department
as 1:2023cv23802
Plaintiff:
Joshua Michael Van Schaick
Defendant:
Miami- Dade Aviation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Gonzalez v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
Martin Marin Gonzalez
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, John Doe, I, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crim v. Chapa
as 22-40641
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Joshua Michael Crim
Defendant / Appellant:
Salvador Armando Chapa
Youmans v. City of Medina, Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv01036
Plaintiff:
Joshua Michael Youmans
Defendant:
City of Medina, Tennessee and Chris Mathenia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disability Rights Maryland v. Prince George's County Public Schools et al
as 8:2021cv03001
Defendant:
Disability Rights Maryland, Prince George's County Public Schools, Dr. Monica Goldson, CEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennifer Conta et al v. City of Huntington Beach et al
as 8:2021cv01897
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Conta and Joshua Michael Bentley
Defendant:
City of Huntington Beach, Officer Tolmasoff, Officer Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crim v. County of Aransas, Texas et al
as 2:2020cv00270
Defendant:
Kristen B. Barneby, County of Aransas, Texas and Salvador Armando Chapa
Plaintiff:
Joshua Michael Crim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blasen v. Blasen
as 2:2020cv01026
Respondent:
Joshua Michael Blasen
Petitioner:
Cynthia Jean Blasen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sharyl Marden v. County of Midland, et al
as 17-1408
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHARYL MARDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF MIDLAND, JEFFERY DEROCHER, BRIAN KEIDEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
