Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Davis et al v. Berrien, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Melvin Davis, Sr., Charase Dorsey, Anisha Bird and others
Defendant:
Berrien, County of, Steve Pierangeli, Mark Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Lush, Stephen v. Taylor, Christine et al
as 3:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lush
Defendant:
Christine Lyn Taylor, Carlo Esqueda, Valerie L. Bailey-Rihn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Pickens County, Alabama et al
as 7:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Pickens County, Alabama, Craig Patterson, David L Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jensen v. Minnesota Board of Medical Practice et al
as 0:2023cv01689
Plaintiff:
Dr. Scott Jensen
Defendant:
Minnesota Board of Medical Practice, Ruth Martinez, Elizabeth A. Huntley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BAILEY v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2021cv02517
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. BAILEY, JR.
Defendant:
R. YOUNG, CHANDLER and PIKE TOWNSHIP AMBULANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. BAILEY, JR.
Defendant:
R. YOUNG, CHANDLER and PIKE TOWNSHIP AMBULANCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00272
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1683
Zajac v. Statton et al
as 0:2020cv02148
Defendant:
Maria K Statton, Cheryl L Bailey, Patricia J Lindholm and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robert John Zajac and Robert Zajac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00671
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
