Cases 1 - 10 of 286
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wesch #278324 v. Leach et al
as 2:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jason Frederick Wesch #278324
Defendant:
Jennifer I. Leach and Jackson, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jerome Garcia v. James Swick
as 24-2158
Plaintiff:
JEROME GARCIA
Defendant:
JAMES SWICK and MICHAEL LEACH
Kasle et al v. Putten et al
as 3:2024cv08015
Defendant:
Bonnie Hansen, Sathvik Nori, Wndy Porter and others
Plaintiff:
Margarette Kesselman, Daniel Rief, Scott Lyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brown et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 3:2024cv06017
Plaintiff:
Talisia Brown and Q. J.
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Michael Leach, Pee Dee Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Assault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00298
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Alexis Carberry v. Lancaster County Sheriff Office
as 24-1852
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS CARBERRY BENSON
Defendant:
SCDMV, through Kevin Shwedo, SCDSS, through Michael Leach, LANCASTER COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, Individually and represented by Barry Faile and others
CONTO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2024cv08189
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY CONTO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF STATE POLICE, NICHOLAS HOGAN, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Leach et al
as 4:2024cv00674
Defendant:
Whitney Davis, Jonathan Cone, Lynn Marie Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1989
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.