Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Billie v. Dubay
as 23-1076
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Petura Billie, Natural Person, In Propria Persona
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Kevin Dubay, Judge Patty Pittman, Hartford Superior Court Clerk Susan Kenkos and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Billie v. Dubay
as 23-381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Petura Billie, Natural Person, In Propria Persona
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Kevin Dubay, Judge Patty Pittman, Hartford Superior Court Clerk Susan Kenkos and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harris v. Guardian Asset Management et al
as 3:2022cv01528
Plaintiff:
Roney Harris
Defendant:
Guardian Asset Management, Jerry Mavellia, HSBC Bank USA, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MPawinayo v. Rothwell et al
as 3:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Leopold MPawinayo
Defendant:
Kimberlin Rothwell and City of Nashville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leopold Kleynzinger v. SSA
as 22-15903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEOPOLD KLEYNZINGER
Defendant / Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
