Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Armer et al v. County of Montgomery et al
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Selena Reyes, Bruce Armer, Robert Murray and others
Defendant:
County of Montgomery and Shawn J. Bowerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. Dockery et al
as 4:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
Jake Michael Peterson
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Dwayne Dockery, Asst. Chief Deputy Barry Caver, Lawrence Goodno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryan Moderson, et al v. City of Neenah, et al
as 23-2843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN MODERSON, ESTATE OF MICHAEL PETERSON and STEVEN ERATO
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEENAH, ANGELA EICHMANN, SHAUN O'BRE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jama v. Wright County et al
as 0:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Abdiweli Jama
Defendant:
Wright County, Michael Peterson, Wright County Correctional Office Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moderson et al v. City of Neenah et al
as 1:2021cv00272
Defendant:
Jonathan Kuffel, Angela Eichmann, Shaun O'Bre and others
Plaintiff:
George Fuerte, Ryan Moderson, Michael Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2018cv81529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 13131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv01148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
