Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Wilkerson et al v. Gladson et al
as 5:2024cv00372
Defendant:
William Woods, William McDonald Gladson and Peter M Brigham
Plaintiff:
Malachi Stocker and Malisa Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McAdoo v. City of Fort Worth et al
as 4:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Malachi McAdoo
Defendant:
Officer Green FNU, City of Fort Worth, City of Fort Worth Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENSON v. CALVARY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL et al
as 1:2024cv00968
Defendant:
GWAITNEY, LORI STAFFORD, AMY and others
Plaintiff:
JARED MALACHI HENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thomas Waters v. Brandon Reish, et al
as 24-1270
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WATERS, a/k/a Nephilim Shakur Waters, a/k/a Afeni Shakur
Defendant:
BRANDON R. REISH, Public Defender, BRIAN GALLAGHER, United States Attorney, GERALD KARAM, United States Attorney and others
CRUZ v. BRANTLEY
as 2:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
ENRIQUE CRUZ
Defendant:
MALACHI BRANTLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
YORK v. MACON COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 5:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
MALACHI Z YORK and Dwight D York
Defendant:
MACON COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
