Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Smith v. Office of Children Service (OCS) et al
as 3:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Din Ogan Shango Smith
Defendant:
Office of Children Service (OCS), Alferd Britz, Leslie Johnston-Dowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Sue C. Clark Properties, LLC et al v. City of Brookhaven, Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv04409
Plaintiff:
Sue C. Clark Properties, LLC, Carl N. Clark Estate Properties, LLC, David B. Wolfson and others
Defendant:
City of Brookhaven, Georgia, John A. Ernst, Jr. and Christian M. Sigman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00160
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Martin, Jr. v. Clark et al
as 3:2010cv01500
Plaintiff:
William D. Martin, Jr.
Defendant:
Theodore N. Clark, Martin G. Shelley and Board of Education of the Bellevue City School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
