Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Rafati v. Fort Bend County Texas et al
as 4:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Attorney Haroon Rafati
Defendant:
Fort Bend County Texas, Sheriff Eric Fagan, Gregory Markovsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Broadstone Security LLC, et al
as 1:2022cv01385
Plaintiff:
Reginald Norvell Robinson
Defendant:
Broadstone Security LLC doing business as Nova Armory, Shawn G. Poulin and Ofc. M. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08421
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Preston v. DC Tours & Transportation et al
as 8:2020cv03103
Defendant:
Norvel F. Wood and DC Tours & Transportation
Plaintiff:
Parris A. Preston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norvell Fobi v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2020cv05288
Petitioner:
Plaintiff Norvell Fobi
Defendant:
Officer Windle Hawkins, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Officer Rudy Lucero and others
Plaintiff:
Norvell Fobi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Boyd et al v. Norvell
as 1:2019cv01162
Plaintiff:
Dannie Lee Boyd and Marcus Ladelle Currie
Defendant:
Drew Norvell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
