Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Johnson v. Carrols Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Carrols Corporation, Restaurant Brand International, Inc., Burger King Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Carrols Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Carrols Corporation, Restaurant Brand International Inc., Burger King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Carrols Corp et al
as 3:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Carrols Corp, Restaurant Brand International Inc., Burger King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Carrols Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv01548
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Carrols Corp., Restaurant Brand International Inc., Burger King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BOWES-NORTHERN v. RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02619
Plaintiff:
SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN
Defendant:
RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL INC. and BURGER KING CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Restaurant Brands International Inc. et al (MAG+)
as 2:2021cv00084
Defendant:
Burger King and Restaurant Brands International Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peter James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00132
Plaintiff:
Rosalind Richardson
Defendant:
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc. and Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc. doing business as Restaurant Brands International, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
