Cases 1 - 10 of 1,093
Briddell v. City of Shelby, et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Angelita Briddell
Defendant:
City of Shelby and John White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Ross v. Tipton County
as 2:2024cv02313
Plaintiff:
Shelby Ross
Defendant:
Tipton County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Manning v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 24-5058
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MANNING, as the Administrator of the Estate of Terence Crutcher, Sr.
Defendant:
CITY OF TULSA and BETTY JO SHELBY
Shaw v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv02309
Plaintiff:
Tekeva Deshuna Shaw
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department, Memphis Police Internal Affairs Bureau, Tennessee Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOGGS v. HOLMES et al
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BOGGS
Defendant:
CHASE HOLMES, JASON MYERS, TRAVIS KEMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
D'allo v. Modrijan et al
as 3:2024cv05325
Plaintiff:
Timjae A D'allo
Defendant:
Stephanie Modrijan, Vanessa MacBride, Courtney Durrah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watts v. Juvenile Defender's Office et al
as 2:2024cv02280
Plaintiff:
Roger Watts
Defendant:
Juvenile Defender's Office, Mayor Lee Harris and Shelby County Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shank v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00745
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Shank
Defendant:
Shelby W. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Shelby County, Alabama v. Beaulieu
as 2:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Shelby County, Alabama
Defendant:
Henri N Beaulieu, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
