Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Russell v. Stark County Job and Family Services/CPS et al.
as 5:2023cv01940
Plaintiff:
Chamone Russell and Chamone R. Russell
Defendant:
Stark County Job and Family Services/CPS, Sue Snyder, Linda Chamblis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stouffer v. Crow et al
as 5:2021cv01000
Plaintiff:
Bigler Jobe Stouffer, II and Bigler Jobe Stouffer
Defendant:
Scott Crow, Randy Chandler, Betty R Gesell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stouffer et al v. Sharp et al
as 6:2020cv00239
Plaintiff:
Bigler Jobe Stouffer, II and Transformations Int. Inc.
Defendant:
Tommy Sharp and Western Sportsman Club, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moyd v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2019cv01356
Plaintiff:
Antwan Moyd
Defendant:
J. Michael Stouffer, State of Maryland, Officer Bowders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. State of Maryland et al.
as 1:2019cv01335
Defendant:
Allen Gang, J. Michael Stouffer, State of Maryland and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1131
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cruz v. Delgado et al
as 4:2016cv03568
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Cruz
Defendant:
Rolando Delgado, Jr, G Perkins, T Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cullison, Jr. v. Queen Anne's County et al
as 1:2015cv03544
Plaintiff:
Raymond Gene Cullison, Jr.
Defendant:
Queen Anne's County, Stephen E. Stouffer, Morris Jones, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOUFFER v. THE CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2015cv03523
Plaintiff:
HARRY STOUFFER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF READING, VAUGHN SPENCER, BRIAN NICARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
