Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Timmons v. Crawford et al
as 4:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Wondell Timmons, Jr.
Defendant:
Lasheena Crawford, Bradley Keith Hunt, Lt Mike Hartson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv05040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
John McSheffrey v. Lily Wilder
as 22-2131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MCSHEFFREY
Defendant / Appellee:
LILY I. WILDER, in her individual and Official capacities and RYAN T. DAVIS, in his individual and Official capacities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
John McSheffrey v. Lily Wilder
as 22-1800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN P. MCSHEFFREY and JOHN MCSHEFFREY
Defendant / Appellee:
LILY I. WILDER, in her individual and Official capacities and RYAN T. DAVIS, in his individual and Official capacities
McSheffrey v. Wilder et al
as 2:2021cv00630
Plaintiff:
John P. McSheffrey
Defendant:
Lily I. Wilder and Ryan T. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Morgan et al
as 1:2020cv00168
Plaintiff:
Marvin T Davis
Defendant:
Officer Rachael Ward, Officer Ryan Morgan and City of Middletown Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHEPHERD v. HTD CONSULTING, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05157
Defendant:
JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE, HENRY T. DAVIS, HTD CONSULTING, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SHEPHERD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
