Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Braxton et al v. Stokes et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Patrick Braxton, James Ballard, Barbara Patrick and others
Defendant:
Haywood Stokes, III, Gary Broussard, Jesse Donald Leverett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1550
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hines v. Bridgeport Hospital et al
as 3:2022cv00622
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines
Defendant:
Bridgeport Hospital, Skull & Bones Associations, Bridgeport Police and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Oregon Bankers Association et al v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2020cv01375
Plaintiff:
Lewis & Clark Bank, Oregon Bankers Association, Bank of Eastern Oregon and others
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Director of DCBS Andrew Stolfi, Ellen Rosenblum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. The Peoples Bank/Biloxi, MS et al
as 1:2017cv00349
Plaintiff:
Rena Hill
Defendant:
The Peoples Bank/Biloxi, MS , Jennifer Schloegel, Timothy L. Murr and others
Cause Of Action: Right to re-employment of inducted persons
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00741
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
