Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Wernick v. NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 2:2023cv03862
Plaintiff:
Batya Wernick
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, THOMAS CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Clark v. Doe
as 4:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Thomas Clark
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Cox v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2021cv00984
Plaintiff:
Tyler Cox
Defendant:
City of Portland and Thomas Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coalition for Good Governance et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2021cv02070
Plaintiff:
Georgia Advancing Progress Political Action Committee, Ryan Graham, Patricia Pullar and others
Defendant:
Brad Raffensperger, Anh Le, Rebecca N. Sullivan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Georgia First Amendment Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02067
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Clark v. DeKalb County Sheriff et al
as 1:2018cv00387
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Clark and Thomas Clark
Defendant:
DeKALB COUNTY SHERIFF DONALD LAUER, T. McCormick, T. Olinske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Hurd et al
as 1:2018cv01538
Plaintiff:
Thomas Clark
Defendant:
Officer Spicer, City of Dover, Delaware and Scott Hurd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEADEN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LAW DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv03016
Defendant:
THOMAS CLARKE, GREGORY HOLMAN, LT. JOHN MCCROREY and others
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM HEADEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skipper et al v. Clark
as 1:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Sierra N. Skipper and S.R.S.
Defendant:
Thomas Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
