Cases 91 - 100 of 3,730
Woods v. Ralston et al
as 1:2023cv02029
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Woods
Defendant:
George Ralston, Paula Price, Tracie Parkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HODGE v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv24738
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT HODGE
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, K WATKINS, D JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane-Bey v. Alfred Lane T98017, et al
as 23-1993
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED DARNELL LANE-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ALFRED DARNELL LANE T98017, MAURA TRACY HEALEY, Governor, State of Massachusetts, in her individual and official capacity, SHAWN P. JENKINS, Chief of Staff, Massachusetts Department of Correction, in his individual and official capacity and others
Jenkins v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv01606
Plaintiff:
Darryal Ledel Jenkins
Defendant:
CO Smith, T Barentro, CO Krome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkins v. Staten et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Parkins
Defendant:
Deigarion M Staten, Scott Taylor, Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Betty Jenkins v. Warden Michael Segal
as 23-3550
Petitioner / Appellant:
Betty Lee Jenkins
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Michael Segal
Nunez v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv05347
Petitioner:
Luis Alfonso Nunez
Respondent:
Warden S. Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Radford v. Jenkins-White et al
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Angela Jenkins-White and Moses Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Biecker et al
as 5:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Chris Biecker, FNU Miller, R. Honeycutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
