Cases 91 - 100 of 192
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00258
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. Department of Treasury et al
as 4:2021cv00242
Defendant:
Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Luther Wayne Dillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2021cv00520
Plaintiff:
Rudy Laverne Johnson, Rudy Levelle Johnson and Ammaroo
Defendant:
Arizona State Legislature, Arizona Department of Treasury and Maricopa County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pitts v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2021cv00228
Defendant:
April Dyann Gibson, Department of Treasury, T Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archuleta v. U.S. Department of Treasury
as 3:2021cv00508
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Treasury
Plaintiff:
Samuel E. Archuleta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01778
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00168
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00130
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gill v. Ouachita River Correctional Unit Medical Staff et al
as 6:2021cv06025
Defendant:
Michael Dean Osborne, Ouachita River Correctional Unit Medical Staff, Bankruptcy 2006 & 2013 and others
Plaintiff:
Johnse Desmon Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 4:2021cv00182
Plaintiff:
Duane L. Berry
Defendant:
United Stats Department of the Treasury, Seized Federal Securities and United States Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
