Cases 91 - 100 of 5,449
Meek-Freeman v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
King Nobelmind Meek-Freeman and Derrick LaMonte Carroll
Defendant:
Gov. Wes Moore, Commissioner of Department of Corrections for Maryland, Warden Jeff Nines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 4:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
Derrick Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Morris v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Derrick M. Morris
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Boyd v. Spartanburg, City of et al
as 7:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Latasha Monique Boyd
Defendant:
Spartanburg, City of, South Carolina DSS, Spartanburg Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Webster v. Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv04024
Plaintiff:
Derrick Orlando Webster
Defendant:
Jeffrey Anderson, Dywayne Hoffstetter, William Bresnaham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorenzo Wilson v. Brandon Robinson, et al
as 24-5091
Plaintiff:
LORENZO LANDELL WILSON
Defendant:
BRANDON ROBINSON, BRIAN DAVID GOULDY, DERRICK DAUGHERTY and others
Hallman v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
DERRICK HALLMAN
Defendant:
WARDEN OTIS SMITH, JONES and SABRINA PORTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Steven Williams
Defendant:
William Marshall, Jarrod Wilson, Jonathan Frame and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bain v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Tamien Derrick Bain
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harrison v. USA
as 3:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Derrick L. Harrison
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
