Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 290
Timothy Doyle Young v. United States
as 2:2018cv06435
Defendant: United States
Plaintiff: Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Sessions et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv11517
Respondent: Jeff Sessions, Department of Justice United States and First Circuit Judicial Conference Committee
Petitioner: Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03079
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Young v. Sessions et al
as 2:2018cv00700
Defendant: United States, US Attorney, Southern District Ohio, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff: Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv02147
Defendant: UNITED STATES, DEPT. OF JUSTICE and JEFF SESSIONS
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Sessions et al
as 9:2018cv00829
Defendant: United States, Department of Justice and Jeff Sessions
Plaintiff: Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Sessions et al
as 4:2018cv02443
Defendant: Department of Justice, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Jeff Sessions
Plaintiff: Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Sessions et al
as 1:2018cv04631
Plaintiff: Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant: Jeff Sessions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Sessions et al
as 1:2018cv03933
Respondent: Judicial Conference Committee, United States, Judicial Council Second Circuit and others
Petitioner: Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Young v Sessions We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv12047
Plaintiff: Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant: Jeff Sessions

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?