Cases 111 - 120 of 141
US v. David Roy
as 11-7551
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID RAY ROY, a/k/a Pooh
Sanchez v. Frakes et al
as 3:2011cv05888
Petitioner:
David Ray Sanchez
Respondent:
Scott Frakes and Rob McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barbour v. Canterburg et al
as 7:2010cv00579
Plaintiff:
David Ray Barbour
Defendant:
Lt. Canterburg and Lt. Morani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Evans v. Larry Norris, et al
as 10-3376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Ray Evans
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Wendy Kelley, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Ray Hobbs, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Defendant:
Mike Beebe, Governor, State of Arkansas, Dustin McDaniel, Attorney General of Arkansas and Stephen Outlaw, Deputy Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC
Ronald Bricker v. Michael Harlow, et al
as 10-3295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. BRICKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HARLOW, FRED J. RUFFO, WILLIAM AYERS and others
Spradlin v. Osborne et al
as 4:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
David Ray Spradlin
Defendant:
David Osborne and Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbour v. Bryant
as 7:2010cv00168
Plaintiff:
David Ray Barbour
Defendant:
D. Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brock v. Ray et al
as 3:2010cv00104
Plaintiff:
Dennis R Brock
Defendant:
David Ray, Sam Nelson, John Leach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roy v. USA
as 3:2009cv00788
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David Ray Roy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Deaton v. Texas Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv02099
Plaintiff:
David Ray Deaton
Defendant:
Texas Department of Corrections and Hutchins State Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
