Cases 111 - 120 of 672
Regassa v. Dunbar et al
as 8:2022cv00466
Petitioner:
Admassu Regassa
Respondent:
Warden R.S. Dunbar, AWR Wilson, Ms. B. White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Milam v. Leslie County Detention Center et al
as 6:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Harold Michael Milam
Defendant:
Leslie County Detention Center, Leslie County Fiscal Court Judge, Danny Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNBAR, III v. LUCIANWOOD et al
as 3:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH S. DUNBAR, III
Defendant:
OFC. LUCIANWOOD and OFC PEDONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunbar v. Annucci
as 1:2022cv00222
Petitioner:
Jermaine Dunbar
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAMIREZ v. SANTIAGO et al
as 3:2022cv00784
Petitioner:
GUILLERMO RAMIREZ
Defendant:
SANTIAGO, SGT ANDERSON, MICHAOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duncan v. Dunbar et al
as 9:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Duncan
Defendant:
Marvin Dunbar, Heather Glover, Carol Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hightower v. Dunbar
as 4:2021cv04155
Petitioner:
David Hightower
Respondent:
Warden Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dunbar v. Centurion of Arizona LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00503
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunbar
Defendant:
Centurion of Arizona LLC, Nelfa Padovano, M Zubicki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Santiago et al
as 5:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Ramirez
Defendant:
Santiago, Anderson, Michaod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunbar v. Shinn et al
as 4:2021cv00488
Petitioner:
Kevin Dunbar
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
