Cases 111 - 120 of 928
Gary v. Toney et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
James Edward Gary, Jr.
Defendant:
Deborah Toney and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bane #282910 et al v. Schiebner
as 1:2022cv00210
Petitioner:
James Edward Bane #282910
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Rose, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 22-6218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD ROSE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, HILL-FINKLEA DETENTION CENTER and others
James Clark v. Thahesha Jusino
as 22-55152
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
THAHESHA L. JUSINO, Warden
James Bryant v. United States Marshals Service
as 22-1046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD BRYANT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Smith #267009 et al v. Schiebner
as 1:2021cv01058
Petitioner:
Derrick Lee Smith #267009 and James Edward Bane #282910
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Schwartz
as 3:2021cv50466
Plaintiff:
James Edward Johnson
Defendant:
Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith #267009 et al v. Schiebner et al
as 1:2021cv01005
Petitioner:
Derrick Lee Smith #267009, Eddie Ryan Lewis #616302, Joseph Ambrose #185357 and others
Respondent:
James Schiebner, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McKinnon v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00808
Petitioner:
James Edward McKinnon, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phillips v. Burgos
as 2:2021cv00089
Petitioner:
James Edward Phillups and James Edward Phillips
Respondent:
Acting Warden Burgos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
