Cases 111 - 120 of 879
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03067
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roe v. Williams
as 4:2020cv01021
Petitioner:
Joseph Roe
Respondent:
Warden Mark K. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Voltz-Loomis et al v. McMaster et al
as 5:2020cv01533
Petitioner:
Allen Slaughter, Jeanne Voltz-Loomis, Jane Roes 1 through 10 and others
Respondent:
Mollie Dupriest Taylor, Dan Batson, Christopher F Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Juan Molina v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2020cv00518
Defendant:
J. Frias, G. Gasgonia, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Molina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruthellen Sheflin et al v. Margaret Scherin et al
as 2:2020cv02265
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Andrews, Thomas Earl Andrews, T. Earl Andrews and others
Defendant:
Margaret Scherin, Dose, Skornia Law Group LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. State of Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Centurion of Minnesota, L.L.C., Jeffrey T. Titus, James M. Olson and others
Plaintiff:
David Laurence Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warwick v. Doe et al
as 3:2020cv00227
Defendant:
Debbie Wilson, Joseph Breton, Stephanie McClain and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Warwick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirksey v. Dobbs et al
as 2:2020cv00299
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lavell Kirksey
Defendant:
Ruth Roe, Dobbs, Burdick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2020cv00679
Defendant:
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY-UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Molina v. Diaz et al
as 3:2019cv08333
Defendant:
J. Frias, G. Gasgonia, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Molina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.