Cases 111 - 120 of 4,583
Blaine v. Berris et al
as 3:2023cv01614
Plaintiff:
Jayevon L. Blaine
Defendant:
Peter Berris, Lynne Munday, J. Brennan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alarcon #291020 v. Ochoa et al
as 2:2023cv02587
Plaintiff:
Javier Velazquez Alarcon
Defendant:
W Ochoa, Unknown Castregon, F Aruizu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkerson v. O.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2023cv01865
Plaintiff:
William J. Parkerson
Defendant:
O.D.O.C., Whelan, C. Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sanchez v. Warden et al
as 1:2023cv01706
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Sanchez
Defendant:
Warden, B. Cates, Officer Murro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez-Mendoza v. Stearns
as 1:2023cv00233
Petitioner:
Jairo Ivan Sanchez-Mendoza and Jairo Ivan Ambriz
Respondent:
Cully Stearns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
SANCHEZ v. LUNDY
as 2:2023cv22947
Plaintiff:
DAVID SANCHEZ
Defendant:
DR. JAMES LUNDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez (PS) v. Weld County District Court
as 1:2023cv03216
Petitioner:
Efren Tomas Sanchez
Respondent:
Weld County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Sanchez v. Pfeiffer
as 2:2023cv02806
Petitioner:
Anthony A. Sanchez
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Ogg et al
as 2:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Ronald Thomas
Defendant:
Kim Ogg, Ken Paxton, Molly Wurzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Scoggins et al
as 7:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Raul Sanchez
Defendant:
Correctinal Officer FNU Scoggins, Correctional Officer FNU Carbojal and Correctional Officer FNU Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
