Cases 131 - 140 of 1,186,082
HARRELL v. PAYNE et al
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
QUINYATTE JARMAINE HARRELL
Defendant:
PAYNE and ASHLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of Louisville et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Publlic Affairs, Human Resources Victims Right Services, Craig Greenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Alonzo
as 1:2024cv01460
Plaintiff:
Kyeem King
Defendant:
Fateema Alonzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv01457
Plaintiff:
Robert Gary Moore
Defendant:
Ronald Weber, Lark and Commissioner of Correctional Division of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Putney v. Harford County Government et al
as 1:2024cv01459
Plaintiff:
Kory Putney
Defendant:
Harford County Government, Sheriff Jeffrey R. Gahler and Warden Daniel Galbraith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Deramus v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03127
Plaintiff:
Willie Darnell Deramus
Defendant:
J. Nuna Lee, Sgt. B. Overton, Lt. Spruill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton v. Reese et al
as 3:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
Arnold Eaton
Defendant:
Michael Reese, Colette Peters, All Former Directors of The Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Hatfield et al
as 3:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewan Robertson
Defendant:
Gary Hatfield and Amber L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weber v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
David A. Weber
Defendant:
Duane Daniels, District Attorney and Judge FNU Tibby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Lange
as 6:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Quinten Lovell Brown
Defendant:
Eddy Lange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
