Cases 151 - 160 of 47,895
Barnum v. New Orleans City et al
as 2:2024cv02482
Defendant:
Shantia McCormick, Unidentified Party, Anthony Christopher Edenfield and others
Plaintiff:
James C Barnum, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Quien et al
as 0:2024cv03914
Defendant:
L. Willard, Young, Ian Heaslip and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dewayne Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Loden et al
as 3:2024cv00633
Defendant:
Superintendent Unknown Dixon, Officer Unknown Bruce, Deanna Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Rico D. Malone and Roderikus Malone
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02188
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Petitioner:
Anthony C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TEAGLE v. DOC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION'S et al
as 2:2024cv05544
Defendant:
CO RICK, CO SHORTER, CO CLAUSEN and others
Plaintiff:
KYLEAF TEAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Hooper et al
as 2:2024cv00234
Defendant:
Monica V. Rios, Michael Hall and John C. Hooper
Plaintiff:
Samuel Garcia,Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gales v. Zanon et al
as 2:2024cv01304
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Kristine Zanon, Secretary Wisconsin Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marek v. Rankins
as 5:2024cv01076
Respondent:
C Rankins
Petitioner:
Chris Marek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Murphy v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00844
Respondent:
Warden
Unknown:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
Robert A C Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
