Cases 11 - 20 of 268
Kimmel v. Doughty et al
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Davey James Kimmel
Defendant:
C.O. Doughty, C.O. Torres, C.O. McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jidoefor v. United States Attorney Office for the District of MN et al
as 0:2022cv03147
Plaintiff:
Okwuchukwu Jidoefor
Defendant:
United States Attorney Office for the District of MN and Andrew M Luger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Obregon v. Buesgen
as 2:2022cv01513
Petitioner:
Andrew M Obregon
Respondent:
Chris Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M. KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON, RAHEEM ALEEM, OFFICER HERBIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. JOHNSON
as 1:2022cv00855
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M. KING
Defendant:
TERRY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Attorney General et al
as 6:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Marquis B. West
Defendant:
Attorney General, Andrew M. Magruder and Deana S. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barr v. Lebanon County Correctional Facility Medical Staff et al
as 3:2022cv01300
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Barr
Defendant:
Lebanon County Correctional Facility Medical Staff, Tina Litz and Rebecca A. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Branson et al
as 2:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Matthew Phillips
Defendant:
Frank L. Branson, Debbie Dudley Branson, Thomas J Farmers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valero v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv02272
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Valero
Defendant:
Brian Collier, C.F. Hazelwood, Moises Villalobos, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seekamp v. Lannoye
as 2:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Andrew M Seekamp
Defendant:
Lt Lannoye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
