Cases 11 - 20 of 41
GORDON v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2019cv00220
Defendant:
TREST, BURCH, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
LAVONTE D GORDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Chatham County Sheriff Office et al
as 4:2018cv00266
Defendant:
Sgt A Guthry, Officer D. Gordon and Chatham County Sherrif Office
Plaintiff:
Paul M Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORDON v. FLORIDA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2018cv00424
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, TREST, BURCH and others
Plaintiff:
LAVONTE D GORDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conroy v. Gordon et al
as 2:2018cv02626
Defendant:
Arizona, State of and Michael D Gordon
Plaintiff:
Raymond J Conroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Grondolsky
as 1:2017cv12398
Petitioner:
John D. Gordon
Respondent:
Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carl Gordon v. Fred Schilling
as 17-7298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL D. GORDON
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR FRED SCHILLING, Health Services Director of Virginia Department of Corrections and MARK AMONETTE, Chief Physician of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Washington v. Washington State Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv05728
Plaintiff:
William Washington
Defendant:
Washington State Dept of Corrections, Steven Sinclair, Kevin Bovenkamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Management & Training Corp., et al
as 3:2017cv00868
Plaintiff:
Dante' D. Gordon
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp. , MTC Medical, LLC , (FNU) Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Van Schoyck et al
as 3:2017cv00721
Plaintiff:
Dante' D. Gordon
Defendant:
Robert Van Schoyck, Patrick M. McGrath, Spectrum Reporting LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hambrick #108663 v. Gordon et al
as 2:2017cv00054
Defendant:
Michael D Gordon and Unknown Party
Plaintiff:
James Louis Hambrick, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
