Cases 11 - 20 of 103
Timothy King-El v. Matthew W. Wilson
as 22-6242
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY D. KING-EL
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW WILSON, formerly identified as FNU Wilson and SAINT T. TAPP, Unit Manager Assistant, in his Individual and Official Capacities
Defendant:
JEFFERY E. JAMES, Unit Manager, in his Individual and Official Capacities
King, Jr. v. Lockport Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Roy D. King, Jr.
Defendant:
Lockport Police Department, Joliet Police Department, Will County Sheriffs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holloway, Jr. v. Schur
as 5:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Arthur R Holloway, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Schur, Kody R. Schur, Jacqueline Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King, Jr. v. The State of Illinois et al
as 1:2021cv04779
Plaintiff:
Roy D. King, Jr. and Lisa M. Freitag
Defendant:
The State of Illinois, Will County Sheriffs Department, Lisa Kinser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2021cv00576
Plaintiff:
Steven D. King
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon T. Hininger, David M. Garfinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. USA
as 3:2021cv00482
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael D. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
King v. Pollard et al
as 3:2021cv00915
Defendant:
Marcus Pollard, A. Taylor, S. Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Tristin D. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harrell, Jr. v. Leal et al
as 5:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Darious D. King and Ashley N. Leal
Plaintiff:
James Harrell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. King et al
as 5:2021cv00112
Plaintiff:
Frederick D Jones
Defendant:
T Driggers, D King, Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. McCormick et al
as 6:2020cv06091
Defendant:
Sheriff Michael McCormick, Southwest Medical, D King and others
Plaintiff:
Toby Michael Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
