Cases 11 - 20 of 23
United States v. Daniel Lee
as 14-2853
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Daniel Lewis Lee, also known as Daniel Lewis Graham, also known as Danny Lee, also known as D L Graham
Hausken v. Lewis et al
as 3:2014cv05514
Plaintiff:
Phillip Burton Hausken
Defendant:
Daniel Lewis, Department of Corrections and Marc Glazer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Lewis v. Ray Hobb
as 14-1512
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Lewis
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs
Hausken v. Warner et al
as 3:2014cv05072
Plaintiff:
Phillip Burton Hausken
Defendant:
Bernard Warner, Monroe Correctional Complex Superintendent, LaFreniere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Gordy et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00625
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis Bennett, III
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy , U.S. Marshals Service and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Hobbs
as 5:2013cv00158
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shakur v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv02208
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Tabb Bickell, R. Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Levitz
as 8:2011cv02358
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis King
Defendant:
Dana Mark Levitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Daniel Lee
as 11-1380
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Daniel Lewis Lee, also known as Daniel Lewis Graham, also known as Danny Lee, also known as D L Graham
Naseer Shakur v. Jacquel Coelho, et al
as 10-3590
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NASEER SHAKUR, a/k/a Daniel Lewis
Defendant - Appellee:
JACQUELYN COELHO, Assistant District Attorney, District Attorney Office, JOHN VERRECCHIO, Detective, Phila. Police Dept. and STEVEN MOSTOOVYK, Detective, Phila Police Dept
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
