Cases 11 - 20 of 232
(PC) Long v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv01117
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Long
Defendant:
United States, California, Stanislaus County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mogler et al v. Peters et al
as 2:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
Native American Ceremonial Drums Group, Stanley Dashee, Nicholas Lister and others
Defendant:
Collette Peters, RA Heisner and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lunsford v. Jacob et al
as 5:2023ct03176
Plaintiff:
Jamel Tyree Lunsford
Defendant:
Warden Jacob, Warden Locklear, Todd E. Ishee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jumping Eagle v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv05036
Plaintiff:
James Shawn Jumping Eagle
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Steve R. Smith v Jason Eagle
as 3:2023cv02612
Plaintiff:
Steve R. Smith
Defendant:
Jason Eagle and Joe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Tanner Larch
as 23-6451
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TANNER MOREN EAGLE LARCH
Robertson v. Taylor et al
as 1:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Melvin Robertson
Defendant:
Officer Robert Taylor, City of Cleveland and Giant Eagle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOYCE v. USDC JUDGES BETTY PUGH
as 1:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
USDC JUDGES BETTY PUGH, ANGELA MOORE, HENRY ROGERS, JR-SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larch v. USA
as 1:2023cv00049
Petitioner:
Tanner Moren Eagle Larch
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gerald Barnes, II, et al v. Robert Corclova, et al
as 23-35098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD LEROY BARNES II
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JONATHAN ZARCHARKIW, Deputy
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT CORCLOVA, Deputy and JOSH EAGLE, Deputy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
