Cases 11 - 20 of 72,925
Martinez Mayorga v. Meade et al
as 1:2024cv22129
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alonso Martinez Mayorga
Defendant:
Director Michael W. Meade, Susan Dunbar, Patrick J Leckleitner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martinez v. Meade et al
as 1:2024cv22131
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alfonso Martinez
Defendant:
Director Michael W. Meade, Susan Dunbar, Patrick J Leckleitner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Targonsk et al
as 2:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Smith
Defendant:
Targonsk, S. Herrick, G. Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Asbury v. USA
as 3:2024cv00528
Petitioner:
Terickus J. Asbury
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
M v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al
as 4:2024cv03337
Plaintiff:
C M
Defendant:
United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), Ray J. Garcia and Darrell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Brill et al
as 1:2024cv11459
Plaintiff:
Jobari J Johnson
Defendant:
Sgt Brill, Lt Russo, C.O Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Asbury v. USA
as 3:2024cv00527
Petitioner:
Terickus J. Asbury
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Charles Jordan v. J. Barves, et al
as 24-2030
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JEROME JORDAN
Defendant:
J. BARVES, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, J. PUMPHREY, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, LT. BARDO and others
BRADFORD v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00271
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. BRADFORD
Respondent:
J. WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
