Cases 11 - 20 of 243
Jones v. Lamb et al
as 3:2023cv00926
Plaintiff:
Corian Jones
Defendant:
T. Lamb, D. Allen, K. Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullins v. Martinsville City Police Department et al
as 7:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Barry Paul Mullins
Defendant:
Martinsville City Police Department, Officer Parnell, Officer J.R. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Lexington County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2022cv04565
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Lexington County Sheriff's Department, Michael J. Hart and J.R. Belt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
US v. James Roane, Jr.
as 23-1
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES H. ROANE, JR., a/k/a J.R.
GUAJARDO v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
KYREE GUAJARDO
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, CHRIS WILLIAMS, KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alton Brown v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 22-2751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM WOLF, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DR. A. SANTOS and others
Debtor / Appellee:
MINDY ANDRETTI
Johnson v. Adams et al
as 7:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Leon Johnson
Defendant:
J.R. Adams, F. Duty, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston, J.R. v. Crow
as 6:2022cv00133
Petitioner:
Leon Mar'Kel Winston, J.R. and Leon Mar'Kel Winston, Jr
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Kinard et al
as 2:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Jordan Joseph Kinard
Defendant:
Lieutenant D. Leary-Williams, Ofc. E.R. Vaughn, Ofc. M. Toliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
