Cases 11 - 20 of 26,159
Jones v. Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
as 5:2024cv00505
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00787
Defendant:
Joe E Griffin, Wren Autrey, Brent Haltom and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Segal
as 0:2024cv03671
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Petitioner:
Vontia Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
as 3:2024cv00091
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. CDCR Work Change Officer et al
as 3:2024cv01599
Defendant:
CDCR Work Change Officer, Building A-2 / A Yard, Floor and Tower Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Wilhelm et al
as 1:2024cv06826
Defendant:
Tiam Clarke, Daniel J Wadoloski, Isaac Maysonet and others
Plaintiff:
Robert William Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowman v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00475
Defendant:
B. Steffey, Johnny Hall, Jordan Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Lowel Bowman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Douglas
as 4:2024cv12422
Petitioner:
Dexter Carl Jones
Respondent:
Adam Douglas
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Thrower v. Parker et al
as 3:2024cv00412
Defendant:
Duoglivo, Parker, Whittmore and others
Plaintiff:
Shantez O.D. Thrower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Martinez et al
as 3:2024cv01762
Defendant:
Jefferson, Joshua Schoenbeck, John 1 Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
