Cases 11 - 20 of 25
James Ward v. Michael Martel
as 18-55369
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES V. WARD
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL F. MARTEL
Ward v. Ste. Genevieve Sheriff Medical Staff et al
as 1:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
James Robert Ward
Defendant:
Ste. Genevieve Sheriff Medical Staff, Ste. Genevieve Sheriff Jail Staff, Jason Michael Emmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Ste. Genevieve County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2017cv00173
Plaintiff:
James Robert Ward
Defendant:
Ste. Genevieve County Sheriff's Department and Gary J. Stolzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARD v. CAMERON
as 5:2015cv03703
Petitioner:
JAMES F. WARD
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James V. Ward v. Michael F. Martel
as 2:2014cv08021
Respondent:
Michael F. Martel
Petitioner:
James V. Ward
WARD v. WARDEN et al
as 5:2014cv00291
Plaintiff:
JAMES RAY WARD
Defendant:
BRUCE CHATMAN, B D SCOTT, JENNISE LAGAIL MAYS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Bellotti et al
as 1:2013cv12054
Plaintiff:
James T. Ward
Defendant:
Michael G. Bellotti , P.J. Coletta , Fred Canniff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reviere v. Fleming et al
as 3:2012cv06534
Plaintiff:
Raymond Reviere
Defendant:
Leslie B. Fleming, Thomas E. Hollenhorst, Manuel A. Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Ward v. Kuma DeBoo
as 12-7189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES I. WARD
Defendant - Appellee:
KUMA J. DEBOO, Warden, DR. RAMIREZ, Regional Clinical Director, DR. ALLEN, Chief of Health Programs, Central Office and others
Ward v. DeBoo
as 1:2011cv00068
Plaintiff:
James I. Ward
Defendant:
Kuma J. DeBoo and Ellen Mace-Leibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
