Cases 11 - 20 of 1,899
Krueger v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00418
Petitioner:
Kent Anthony Krueger
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Scott
as 24-30219
Petitioner:
Antoine Edwards
Respondent:
Bradley Scott, Tracey Flemming Davillier, Theoplus Kent and others
Hill v. WellPath Medical Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
WellPath Medical Corporation, Kent, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lay v. Artis et al
as 2:2024cv10795
Plaintiff:
John David Lay
Defendant:
Fredeane Artis, Walker, Kent and others
Seain Hull v. David Yost, et al
as 24-3257
Plaintiff:
SEAIN C. HULL
Defendant:
DAVID YOST, MATTHEW E. CRALL, SCOTT KENT and others
Frederick Stampone v. Michigan Supreme Court, et al
as 24-1252
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK STAMPONE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT, Official and or personal capacity, JULIE CLEMENT, Clerk, official and or personal capacity, MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS, Official and personal capacity and others
Rose v. Darden et al
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Derek Kent Rose
Defendant:
Tony Darden, Cris Desmond, Angela Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman (ID 43826) v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 5:2024cv03038
Plaintiff:
Charles Leroy Freeman, III
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Department of Veterans Affairs, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Blake v. Jordan et al
as 6:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tony Kent Blake
Defendant:
Suzanne Jordan, Terry Parks, Choctaw County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffery Johnson v. Casey Kimbro, et al
as 24-5203
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CASEY KIMBRO, PREA CORD, OFFICER PISZNER, PREA CORD, CAPTAIN MIKE HOPKINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
