Cases 11 - 20 of 123
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lenz v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01359
Plaintiff:
Jason Lenz
Defendant:
Anette Chambers-Smith, Michael Anderson and Warden Jennifer Gillece-Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thoerig v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01272
Plaintiff:
Douglas Thoerig
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Michael Andrson, Warden Jennifer Gillece-Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles Head v. USA, et al
as 22-2068
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES HEAD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES R. CARR, JR., MATTHEW MORRIS and others
Balentine v. Red et al
as 9:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson Balentine
Defendant:
Jane Red, Jane Blonde and Corrections Supervisor Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 22-10632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, former Commissioner, HOMER BRYSON, former Commissioner and others
Balentine v. Annucci et al
as 9:2021cv01383
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson Balentine
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Patrick Reardon, Glenn McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jessup v. Sandy et al
as 1:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Hunter Jessup
Defendant:
Jeff S. Sandy, Betsy Jividen, John Sheeley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Anderson
as 4:2021cv00339
Respondent:
Michael Anderson
Petitioner:
Joseph Wayne Robertson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
