Cases 11 - 20 of 9,010
Vernon Robinson v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al
as 24-1999
Plaintiff:
VERNON ROBINSON
Defendant:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYCOMING COUNTY
Robinson v. Benzel
as 2:2024cv00413
Petitioner:
Tomaz S Robinson
Respondent:
Jason Benzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Braswell et al
as 5:2024ct03083
Plaintiff:
Randy Michael Robinson
Defendant:
Officer Braswell, Officer Paul, Sgt. Gleason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Maccain
as 4:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
Maccain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Boyd et al
as 8:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Defendant:
Taggart Boyd, Unit Administrator, CM Messner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00520
Petitioner:
Nicholas Gregory Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv04054
Plaintiff:
Santos Gerardo Mendoza and Santos Gerardo Mendoza Castellon
Defendant:
Lieutenant Ross, Jailer McMores, Sergeant Heartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Greenville County Detention Center
as 6:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeHerrera et al v. GCCF
as 1:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Julian DeHerrera, Edwardo Jesus Casillas, Jarell Robinson and others
Defendant:
GCCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
